Next: Post-hoc
Up: NHST
Previous: Steps
Contents
Planned Comparisons
- Also called: a-priori comparisons or planned contrasts.
- Used to test specific group differences to evaluate specific hypotheses (stated prior to data collection).
- Two general types of planned comparisons.
- Simple Comparisons (we'll stick to these here).
- Each comparison is used to compare two groups.
- With only two groups always, because
- Complex Comparisons.
- Each comparison is used to compare two or more groups.
- e.g., Orthogonal contrasts.
Simple Comparisons
- Suppose, we hypothesized (prior to data collection) that the Red group would recall more words than the Blue group and the Green group would recall less words than the Blue group.
- To do any simple comparison, we need to calculate for that comparison.
- We need a new (always = 1) and a new grand mean (
) for each comparison.
- But, we use the same and which leads to the same
- Then, for each comparison the usual steps are involved:
- You may wish to control for family-wise error rate inflation by dividing the significance level by the number of comparisons.
Simple Comparisons Example
- Recall, we hypothesized (prior to data collection) the Red group would recall more words than the Blue group and the Green group would recall less words than the Blue group.
- This necessitates two planned comparisons.
- One to evaluate
and
- One to evaluate
and
- Using and and with a significance level of 0.05, we get
for each comparison.
Planned Comparison 1: Red (
) versus Blue (
)
and are the same as was used for the omnibus , so is the same as well: 2.083
So;
we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the Red group recalled significantly more words than the Blue group.
Planned Comparison 2: Green (
) versus Blue (
)
and are the same as was used for the omnibus , so is the same as well: 2.083
So;
we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the Green group recalled significantly fewer words than the Blue group.
Family-wise and Pair-wise Error Rates
- Sometimes called the Bonferroni Procedure (after it's founder), it is used to control family-wise error inflation when multiple tests are done in one study.
- FW = desired significance level (or alpha level) divided by the number of comparisons.
- For example, if doing 3 comparisons and wanting a total significance level of 0.05, then:
-
is used for each comparison.
- Often necessary to find an distribution table with exact values, this can be difficult because; most tables are abbreviated for common cutoff points.
- Should be considered when doing planned comparisons.
- Some Post-hoc tests have embedded controls for error rates.
Next: Post-hoc
Up: NHST
Previous: Steps
Contents
jds0282
2010-10-21